stream:// .net core

This tutorial introduces several architectural and design patterns that can be used to implement common scenarios in .NET desktop and mobile applications.

Memory problems in a big .NET application are a silent killer of sorts. Kind of like high blood pressure. You can eat junk food for a long time ignoring it until one day you face a serious problem. In the case of a .NET program, that serious problem can be high memory consumption, major performance issues, and outright crashes. In this post, you'll see how to keep our application's blood pressure at healthy levels.

The Null Object Pattern is a pattern that uses objects with null behavior instead of performing null checks throughout the codebase. ILogger and ILoggerFactory are dependencies that often require a lot of null checking, so they are perfect candidates for the null object pattern. Suppose your classes take ILogger or ILoggerFactory as a dependency, and you are not using the null object pattern. In that case, you will probably find that your code is either subject to NullReferenceExceptions, or forcing implementors to supply loggers as arguments. Use the null object pattern to avoid both these problems. This article teaches you how in C#. Null object might be confusing for some people because it seems to imply that the object reference might be null. However, the opposite is true. The object will never be a null reference. Null refers to the behavior of the object - not the reference itself. I think that a better name for the pattern would be Dummy Object Pattern since the objects you will use are shells with no behavior.  Why Use the Null Object Pattern? If you inject dependencies into your classes, you need to validate against null or perform null checking throughout your code. The null conditional operator ?. helps, but it is still very easy to miss one. Every single missed question mark is a bug in the code. The null object pattern gives you a third option of using a dummy object instead. This reduces the number of code paths and therefore decreases the chance of NullReferenceExceptions while still allowing the implementor to instantiate the class without creating an instance of the dependency. In the case of ILogger, it is quite onerous to create an implementation. Simply put, you shouldn't do it. If you want to implement logging, you should use an existing logging library. It becomes even more onerous if the dependency is ILoggerFactory. The implementor needs to pull in external dependencies or create a cascading set of classes that they may have no idea how to implement. It gets much worse when you try to mock ILogger or ILoggerFactory dependencies. Although it is still important to verify that logging gets called. You can read about that here.  The Basics The good news is that the Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions namespace comes with null objects right out of the box. All you need to do is use NullLogger.Instance and NullLoggerFactory.Instance as default instances in your constructor. That's it. Your class can now depend on these instances, as though there is a real instance.  This example guarantees that the logger will never be null without forcing the code to supply a logger. The readonly modifier ensures that the instance cannot be set to null after construction. The code does not throw a NullReferenceException: using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging; using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions; using System; namespace ConsoleApp { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { new Example().Print(Hello World!); } } public class Example { readonly ILogger _logger; public Example(ILogger logger = null) { _logger = logger ?? NullLogger.Instance; } public void Print(string message) { _logger.LogTrace(Logged message: {message}, message); Console.WriteLine(message); } } } In some cases, your class should take an ILoggerFactory instance because it may need to pass loggers to child dependencies in the future. You can use the same approach. namespace ConsoleApp { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { new Example().Print(Hello World!); } } public class Example { readonly ILogger _logger; readonly ILoggerFactory _loggerFactory; public Example(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory = null) { _loggerFactory = loggerFactory ?? NullLoggerFactory.Instance; _logger = _loggerFactory.CreateLogger<Example>(); } public void Print(string message) { _logger.LogTrace(Logged message: {message}, message); Console.WriteLine(message); } } } Notice that we use the static property instance of both classes. We could create new instances of these objects in each case, but this would consume extra memory CPU to construct. The static instances only instantiate once i...

Sometimes Blazor needs a nudge to render

Launching .NET for game development that runs on a wide variety of platform using purpose built gaming engines. Develop games on Windows, Linux, or mcaOS.

The post describes JetBrains Rider as an alternate to Visual Studio and how Rider can help mitigate some of the Visual Studio pain-points.

I have been a developer for the past 7 years. I’ve gone through a lot of code reviews during that time. I have devoted my time to learn good software engineering practices through C#. Last ye…

Microsoft's .NET Core team admits it needs to be better at supporting contributors to its open-source projects.

How to use System.IO.Pipelines and System.Threading.Channels APIs to speed up processing

C# 8 will ship soon with .Net Core 5, and one of the most exciting features is Source Generators, a great new addition to the .Net ecosystem.